← Zurück zum Projekt

03 · Marktprüfung

Original-Marktprüfungsbericht

Der tatsächlich gespeicherte englische Bericht in derselben Darstellung wie im Renewstory-Konto. Quellenlinks, Befunde und Rechenwerte bleiben erhalten.

Die Kalkulation verwendet die für dieses Projekt geltenden Kontokonditionen.

Business potential at a glance

A complete low-water planting composition

Staples Landscaping · Free customer offering · 10/20/2026

01 Customer task

Homeowners need compatible plants, positions and quantities for a measured small lawn-conversion area.

02 Business value

Free plans may lead to additional installation work, but useful downloads alone do not establish sales.

03 Target market and access

The first assessed market is San Diego homeowners; the relevant service-page channel requires authorization and has unknown reach.

04 Advantage over alternatives

The proposed difference is automatic local composition with recalculated spacing and quantities, not free access or plant filtering.

05 Key assumption

Commercial value assumes successive users buy genuinely additional installation work whose contribution covers specialist preparation and upkeep.

06 Recommendation

Proceed with the commissioned bounded Gartenfroh example, while keeping commercial viability and Staples distribution explicitly unconfirmed.

Market, competition and position

Target audience and route to customers

San Diego County homeowners planning a small, flat rectangular lawn-conversion area; no Germany suitability is implied by the German interface. First researched commercial channel: Staples’ low-water landscaping page, contextually matched to conversion work and an inquiry route. Owner authorization is unestablished; reach, relevant visitors and buyers are unknown.

Usage and ongoing value

Usually once per bed conversion; another area may prompt a new plan. Actual return frequency is unknown. Successive new prospects may buy installation from clearer scopes; recurring arrivals and additional purchases remain unproven.

Assumptions and evidence in the online details
Relevant alternatives
AlternativeWhy switch — or stay?
PermapeopleFree scaled browser planning already exists. Switch for reviewed local automatic compositions and local export; vendor documentation is not a hands-on comparison.
Staples plant database and planning toolsA familiar free starting point for species and project estimates. Switch for measured combinations and quantities; inspected pages do not prove every other composition feature absent.
Professional landscape designSite-based design handles broader constraints. The app suits bounded independent planting, not grading, drainage or construction-ready design.
Manual scaled planting planDrawing mature-size circles and counting plants already produces an actionable result. Switch for immediate, consistent recalculation after edits.

Further alternatives and price comparisons are in the online details.

Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats

Strength

The reference business documents local planting expertise and a plant catalog, providing a relevant foundation for reviewed rules.

Weakness / internal effort

Normalized attributes, composition rules and horticultural ownership still need preparation; published content is not ready-to-use logic.

External opportunity

Homeowners converting lawns must coordinate mature spacing and quantities, a task beyond selecting individual suitable plants.

External threat

Free scaled planners and prepared garden combinations already exist; users may complete the project themselves instead of buying installation.

Business model and economics

Free customer offering · Twelve-month planning horizon

Additional package cost: 0 USD

Development and twelve months of hosting: no additional package cost under the current terms. Social media can be ordered separately at no additional cost under the current terms; not included.

This assessment plans delivery. App creation starts only after your separate development order.

additional commissioned installation projects / year · monetary values in USD

Inputs and derivation
InputLow / base / highWhy this input?
Annual volume0 / 5 / 8Annual additional jobs: 0 without sales access; 5 base; 2 per quarter in the favorable case.
Value / unit300 / 600 / 1,200Contribution per extra job after fulfillment and incremental inquiry/scoping: $300 / $600 / $1,200.
Extra / unit0 / 0 / 0Local deterministic computation; no additional paid API or export service.
Extra annual costs/effort4,800 / 2,700 / 1,800One-time specialist preparation: 40 / 24 / 16 h at $75/h.; Recurring specialist review: 24 / 12 / 8 h annually at $75/h.

Planning assumptions, not a sales or profit forecast. Included and already netted work is not added again.

Year-one result
ScenarioAfter package and own costs
Cautious-1,800 USD
Base300 USD
Favourable4,800 USD

Cautious: low benefit, high costs. Favourable: high benefit, low costs.

At base assumptions, the modelled benefit covers the included costs. Keep the initial scope focused.

Break-even under base assumptions

5 additional commissioned installation projects per year

Annual volume × (value − extra cost per unit) − package costs − own costs. Assumptions are not measured demand.

Your prepared next step

Commissioned app development implements these briefs. The app performs the planned specialist work.

Recommendation

Proceed with the commissioned example, not a claim of proven installation demand.

Implementation package 1

Implement the commissioned Gartenfroh planner around one synchronized planting result. DE/EN planner: planted starting view, editable exclusions, validated substitutions, undo/redo and matching local plan download.

Benefit: Measured composition, not another plant filter, is the useful extension.

Implementation package 2

Prepare the eight-plant rules and original illustrations during app delivery. Source-linked records, conservative editable envelopes, separate water groups and original species-specific artwork.

Benefit: Conflicting widths and different water needs materially affect valid arrangements.

These are the two priority work packages. Further briefs and adjustment rules are in the online details.

Original questions: answers and consequences

For homeowners completing a real bed plan, which subsequently request and commission lawn-conversion work rather than only sourcing plants themselves?

Additional installation purchases are unknown. Documented physical work makes the path coherent, not validated.

Open
For an actual lawn-conversion area, does a generated composition resolve choices that the plant filter alone leaves unresolved?

Arrangement and counting are distinct from filtering. Actual homeowner benefit from the generated result remains unconfirmed.

Partly supported

Selection: 2 priority questions out of 4 original questions are shown here. All questions, findings and uncertainties remain available online.

Research findings do not establish demand. The next phase starts only with your separate decision. Full reasoning and sources remain in the online details.

Full research and reasoning

YOUR MARKET DECISION

A complete low-water planting composition

Staples Landscaping · Free offer · 10/20/2026

Pursue

Proceed with the commissioned example, not a claim of proven installation demand.

The task is concrete and close to documented planting expertise. A bounded catalog and explicit geometry rules support a credible implementation scope. Keep the Gartenfroh demonstration separate from the hypothetical landscaping sales channel.

Strongest argument

Published planting guidance treats arrangement, mature-size spacing and plant counting as distinct work. Automating these steps can add a real result beyond a species shortlist.

Sourced · [5]
Decisive risk

Users may obtain a useful plan and self-install. Neither additional purchases nor authorized access to Staples visitors is established for Gartenfroh.

Unknown
What would change the recommendation

Strengthen the commercial case if authorized access brings successive relevant homeowners and additional project contribution covers specialist preparation and upkeep. Reduce commercial expansion if access stays absent, users only self-install, or inquiry support consumes the contribution. These are operating conditions, not prerequisites for the commissioned development.

Customer, task and outcome

Selected customer task

Derived hypothesis: turn individual plant choices into a coherent measured bed with correct quantities.

Original audience

San Diego County homeowners replacing a small lawn area with lower-water planting.

Original customer outcome

A complete planting map and plant schedule usable without commissioning a landscape design.

Outcome assessment

A free, independently usable planting map and schedule with dimensioned positions, botanical names, quantities, mature planning footprints and visible site assumptions.

Assumption
Occasion and frequency

Usually once per bed conversion; another area may prompt a new plan. Actual return frequency is unknown.

Assumption · [5]
Why value continues

Successive new prospects may buy installation from clearer scopes; recurring arrivals and additional purchases remain unproven.

Assumption · [1]
Users

San Diego County homeowners planning a small, flat rectangular lawn-conversion area; no Germany suitability is implied by the German interface.

Assumption · [2]
Decision-makers

The homeowner decides whether to commission optional physical conversion work. Planner use itself requires no purchase.

Assumption
Payers

An installation customer pays the physical-work provider; the commissioned Gartenfroh example has no established installation seller or partner.

Assumption
Occasion

A particular conversion area has been chosen, but compatible species, mature spacing, positions and quantities remain unresolved.

Assumption · [5]

Target market and access

Target market

The initial commercial market follows the San Diego catalog and locally deliverable installation, not the interface language. Digital delivery can extend farther only with appropriate regional rules and a real fulfillment route.

Assumption · [1] [2]
Initial segment

Homeowners with manageable rectangular areas who want a usable plan and may prefer professional removal and planting. Complex drainage, slopes and construction design are outside scope.

Assumption
Route to customers

First researched commercial channel: Staples’ low-water landscaping page, contextually matched to conversion work and an inquiry route. Owner authorization is unestablished; reach, relevant visitors and buyers are unknown. Renewstory example publication is separate and does not transfer Staples access.

Assumption · [1] [6]
Reach and delivery constraints

San Diego rules only; flat rectangular beds with editable rectangular exclusions. Unknown sun, drainage and coastal exposure remain visible conditions. No address, photo transfer, account or automatic personal history.

Assumption
Total market

San Diego County homeowners considering lower-water lawn conversion. · Not quantified eligible households · annual opportunity. No reliable eligible-household count was established; county population is not the planner market.

Unknown
Serviceable market

Households with supported bed geometry, growing conditions and a deliverable installation route. · Not quantified suitable projects · annual opportunity. The intersection of catalog suitability, site conditions and physical service capacity is unquantified.

Unknown
Reachable audience

Relevant prospects reached through an authorized placement, distinct from visitors and buyers. · Not quantified reachable relevant prospects · first year. No authorized placement, audience analytics or attributable purchases were established for the example.

Unknown

Alternatives and meaningful advantage

Staples plant database and planning tools

Current outcome

Published species filtering and other project-planning tools.

Sourced · [2] [6]
Effort

The proposed composition task still involves reconciling placements and mature dimensions beyond individual selection.

Assumption · [5]
Price and scope

The inspected tool hub describes its tools as free and ungated.

Sourced · [6]
Potential reason to switch

Obtain actual positions and synchronized counts rather than another shortlist.

Assumption

Permapeople

Current outcome

Advertises scaled beds, real-plant placement, paths and growing information.

Sourced · [3]
Effort

Users arrange their garden; its described saving and sharing route requires an account.

Sourced · [3]
Price and scope

Advertised as free, with no account required to start.

Sourced · [3]
Potential reason to switch

Prefer a prepared San Diego composition that recalculates after substitutions and exclusions.

Assumption

Waterwise Garden Planner templates

Current outcome

Publishes themed garden templates and design instruction.

Sourced · [4]
Effort

A homeowner may need to adapt a template to measured boundaries and existing clear areas.

Assumption
Price and scope

Publicly accessible design resources; no purchase price is used in this free-model comparison.

Sourced · [4]
Potential reason to switch

Receive a dimensioned arrangement adapted to the current area rather than manually adapting a template.

Assumption

Manual scaled planting plan

Current outcome

Guidance describes arrangement, mature dimensions and a plant quantity schedule.

Sourced · [5]
Effort

The homeowner draws, checks spacing and recounts after changes.

Assumption · [5]
Price and scope

The cited instruction is publicly accessible; the homeowner's time is not provider revenue.

Sourced · [5]
Potential reason to switch

Avoid repeated manual matching, measurement and counting.

Assumption

Professional landscape design

Current outcome

The published service considers budget, grading, drainage and material availability from the first sketch.

Sourced · [7]
Effort

Requires professional site-specific involvement rather than immediate independent composition.

Assumption · [7]
Price and scope

No comparable fixed service price was established.

Unknown
Potential reason to switch

Use the app for a small supported bed; retain professional design for unsupported site complexity.

Assumption

How your business could benefit

  1. A homeowner receives an independently usable composition that reduces selection and spacing uncertainty.
  2. Some users voluntarily request physical conversion work rather than only sourcing plants themselves.
  3. The operator scopes the actual site and wins genuinely additional work; an inquiry alone is not economic value.
  4. Contribution after fulfillment and incremental inquiry effort pays for specialist preparation and upkeep.
Additional operating effort

Prepare and periodically review botanical records, compatibility rules and cautions. Inquiry and scoping effort is deducted within project contribution; included platform maintenance is not charged again.

Assumption
Customer relevance

The planning task is evidenced; actual adoption of this app is not. The useful progress is a coherent measured arrangement, not simply a longer list of eligible plants.

Assumption · [2] [5]
Product advantage

Reviewed local automatic compositions, exclusion-aware recalculation and independent export are the proposed distinction. Free browser planning and garden templates already exist.

Assumption · [3] [4]
Business fit

Physical removal, preparation and planting remain purchasable after a plan is downloaded. Whether this creates additional jobs rather than serving existing buyers or DIY users is unknown.

Assumption · [1]
Feasibility

Deterministic placement is a defined delivery method, not a tested result. Source-width disagreements and water-group compatibility require explicit rules alongside geometry.

Assumption · [9] [10] [11] [12] [8]

Economic conditions

All figures cover twelve months. The calculation evaluates the selected model; it is not a sales forecast.

Currency and basis

Model currency: USD. Illustrative amounts excluding sales taxes; no tax advice or researched local tax treatment.

The displayed terms reflect the existing entitlement. The planned app is developed only after a separate order.

Known future package costs: development + twelve months hosting

0 + 0 USD = 0 USD

Social remains optional despite package availability. No established route to San Diego installation buyers justifies assigning it sales effects or commissioning a subscription. Social media is not included.

InputLowBaseHigh
Annual volume · Genuinely additional installation projects won by an authorized operator because of the free planner, excluding existing jobs merely routed through it.058
Value per unit300 USD600 USD1,200 USD
Additional cost per unit0 USD0 USD0 USD
Other annual cost4,800 USD2,700 USD1,800 USD
Annual volume · Genuinely additional installation projects won by an authorized operator because of the free planner, excluding existing jobs merely routed through it.

Annual sensitivity assumptions, not forecasts: low assumes the example supplies no authorized sales access or only DIY use; base assumes five additional suitable small conversions across a year; high assumes two additional jobs per quarter through an authorized relevant route. No traffic or conversion rate is inferred. These volumes describe the hypothetical installation opportunity, not established Gartenfroh sales.

Assumption
Value per unit

Assumed contribution per additional job after plants, crew, materials, travel and incremental inquiry/scoping work. Low represents weak small-job contribution; base a suitable modest conversion; high a stronger-margin scope. These are not researched margins. Customer time savings, water savings and full project revenue are excluded.

Assumption
Additional cost per unit

Additional per-use external service: The specified deterministic local computation and export require no additional paid per-use service.

Assumption
Other annual cost

First-year botanical records, provenance and specialist rule review: One-time first-year allowance: 40/24/16 specialist hours at assumed $75/hour. Covers botanical reconciliation and horticultural decisions, not included programming, hosting or image production. Remove in subsequent-year assessment. Recurring botanical and compatibility review: Recurring specialist allowance: 24/12/8 hours annually at assumed $75/hour for reviewing source changes, correcting plant cautions and maintaining horticultural rules. Excludes included technical maintenance.

Assumption
Included or already netted · not added again

Physical fulfillment and incremental inquiry/scoping

Conditional scenarios
CaseVolumeAfter future costsIncluding assessment
Adverse combination0-1,800 USD-1,800 USD
Base5300 USD300 USD
Favourable combination84,800 USD4,800 USD
Required annual volume at base assumptions

5 Genuinely additional installation projects won by an authorized operator because of the free planner, excluding existing jobs merely routed through it.

Required value per unit at base volume

540 USD

How unit value changes the threshold
Value per unitRequired annual volume
300 USD9 Genuinely additional installation projects won by an authorized operator because of the free planner, excluding existing jobs merely routed through it.
600 USD5 Genuinely additional installation projects won by an authorized operator because of the free planner, excluding existing jobs merely routed through it.
1,200 USD3 Genuinely additional installation projects won by an authorized operator because of the free planner, excluding existing jobs merely routed through it.

Assumptions and findings

For homeowners completing a real bed plan, which subsequently request and commission lawn-conversion work rather than only sourcing plants themselves?

Original assumption

Enough users prefer professional conversion work after obtaining a usable planting composition.

Open

Additional installation purchases are unknown. Documented physical work makes the path coherent, not validated.

Unknown · [1]
Remaining uncertainty

Original question: For homeowners completing a real bed plan, which subsequently request and commission lawn-conversion work rather than only sourcing plants themselves? No user-to-purchase evidence exists.

Decision impact

Retain follow-on sales as a hypothesis, without claiming conversion rates, incrementality or a Gartenfroh installation partner.

For an actual lawn-conversion area, does a generated composition resolve choices that the plant filter alone leaves unresolved?

Original assumption

Homeowners need a complete composition beyond plant filtering and will use its quantities and placement map.

Partly supported

Arrangement and counting are distinct from filtering. Actual homeowner benefit from the generated result remains unconfirmed.

Assumption · [2] [5]
Remaining uncertainty

Original question: For an actual lawn-conversion area, does a generated composition resolve choices that the plant filter alone leaves unresolved? Public guidance establishes the task, not successful app use.

Decision impact

Keep composition and quantities as the main result; do not substitute a questionnaire or shortlist.

Which completed bed plans lead to actual conversion inquiries and commissioned installation, and what work do those homeowners buy?

Original assumption

A useful composition leads some users to commission the company's physical conversion work.

Open

Which plans produce paid work is unknown. DIY planning remains a credible alternative outcome.

Unknown · [1] [3] [5]
Remaining uncertainty

Original question: Which completed bed plans lead to actual conversion inquiries and commissioned installation, and what work do those homeowners buy? Public sources cannot attribute customer purchases.

Decision impact

Count additional commissioned projects and their contribution, not downloads, inquiries or full project revenue.

Can the prepared subset document all required attributes and reuse permissions, and generate valid compositions across representative bed and exposure cases?

Original assumption

A verified and reusable plant subset can support reliable automatic compositions within the bounded scope.

Partly supported

Useful source attributes exist, including conflicting widths. Complete reusable records and valid generated compositions are not yet demonstrated.

Assumption · [9] [10] [11] [12] [8]
Remaining uncertainty

Original question: Can the prepared subset document all required attributes and reuse permissions, and generate valid compositions across representative bed and exposure cases? Original assets and delivery validation remain necessary.

Decision impact

Prepare provenance, conservative envelopes and water-group rules within delivery; geometry validity must not be presented as proof of botanical suitability.

Strategic implications

Strengths, risks and implications

Relevant planting expertise can address a concrete planning task, but free competition and unfinished rules determine the useful scope.

Finding

Compete on the complete measured result and consistent edits, not on free access. Start with the specified eight plants and explicit conditions rather than an unsupported broad catalog.

Assumption · [2] [3] [4] [5]

Preserve a small credible composition engine and independent export; do not broaden geography or species merely to suggest scale.

Recommended next steps

Implement the commissioned Gartenfroh planner around one synchronized planting result.

Prepared implementation brief

DE/EN planner: planted starting view, editable exclusions, validated substitutions, undo/redo and matching local plan download.

Why

Measured composition, not another plant filter, is the useful extension.

What would change the decision

If the eligible plants cannot support three distinct valid variants, show fewer rather than inventing suitability.

Prepare the eight-plant rules and original illustrations during app delivery.

Prepared implementation brief

Source-linked records, conservative editable envelopes, separate water groups and original species-specific artwork.

Why

Conflicting widths and different water needs materially affect valid arrangements.

What would change the decision

Wider documented envelopes or incompatible water needs change eligible species, placement and quantities.

Publish the example without implying Staples affiliation or established installation demand.

Prepared implementation brief

Gartenfroh example pages with the unchanged report; free independent export; no claimed partnership or automatic social subscription.

Why

The researched service page fits the audience, but access and attributable purchases remain unestablished.

What would change the decision

Authorized relevant access and successive additional jobs covering upkeep strengthen the case; DIY-only use weakens it.

Recommended product scope

Include

Gartenfroh example brand and supplied logo; German-first Gartenplaner and English Garden Planner.

Include

San Diego botanical scope, eight-plant catalog and free independent use.

Include

Immediately planted interactive view; two or three meaningfully different valid variants where feasible.

Include

Editable rectangular exclusions, plant selection, replacement and movement; renewed radius, boundary and overlap checks after edits.

Exclude

Implied Staples customer, partnership or distribution permission.

Exclude

Irrigation engineering, drainage diagnosis, construction planning, survival guarantees and unverified child/pet-safety claims.

Exclude

Copied photographs or descriptions, invented live availability, prices, irrigation volumes or rebate certification.

Exclude

Login requirements, personal-input transmission, automatic localStorage and automatic social-media ordering.

Proposed change to the original idea

Treat service-page deployment as conditional; publish the commissioned example through its specified Renewstory pages. The latest brief establishes example publication, not authorization to reach Staples visitors.

Proposed change to the original idea

Use planning envelopes of 8 ft Cleveland sage, 6 ft hummingbird sage, 4 ft deer grass and lavender, 2 ft daisy and Carex, 0.3 m fescue and 10 ft Westringia. These are conservative starting assumptions from the supplied source review, not guaranteed mature dimensions. Preserve conflicting source ranges.

Proposed change to the original idea

Keep Carex in a separate moderate-water group; qualify unknown site conditions and distinguish footprint coverage from future canopy coverage. A shared water-wise label does not establish irrigation compatibility or guaranteed plant coverage.

Original prerequisites

Prepare a verified plant subset with mature dimensions, exposure limits, soil tolerance and water-use compatibility.

Confirm reuse rights for source plant content and create original symbols where image rights are unclear.

Review composition rules, spacing assumptions and excluded site conditions before release.

Assign a horticultural owner to review plant records and correct unsuitable combinations when evidence changes.

Other open starting assumptions

Homeowners want a complete small-bed composition beyond the existing plant filter, and some will commission its physical installation.

A sufficiently useful plant subset can be verified and licensed from existing content or prepared by the company.

The assumed alternative is selecting plants individually and estimating quantities through nursery advice or informal sketches.

Only flat rectangular beds within the prepared rule set are supported; unknown soil or exposure yields explicit conditional alternatives rather than invented suitability.

The result does not design irrigation, diagnose drainage, guarantee plant survival or certify suitability around pets and children.

Plans remain in browser memory until downloaded; no address, account, personal server history or remote photo analysis is required.

Limits and sources

Public research does not replace customer interviews, pilot sales or technical trials. The recommendation does not start app development.

This assessment uses the supplied checked-source research; no customer trials, transactions or technical acceptance tests are claimed.

The commissioned example is real scope, but its publication does not establish an ongoing installation business or authorized Staples access.

The economic cases are sensitivity assumptions, not observed margins, demand or sales forecasts; no conversion-rate-based market size is inferred.

Source disagreements remain visible. Correct spacing does not establish survival, permanent containment or site suitability.

Small-bed plans do not certify rebate eligibility. Physical scoping and any program approval remain separate.

One-off homeowner use can sustain provider value through successive customers; the example alone may instead remain a genuinely one-off demonstration.

Methods: customer task and value, segmentation, alternative comparison, business model, assumption review and economic thresholds. Strategy analysis is added only where relevant to the decision.

[1] Drought Tolerant Landscaping San Diego

The service page provides a relevant conversion-work context and possible inquiry placement. San Diego; supplied research checked October 20, 2026. Provider description, not buyer behavior, audience size or deployment authorization.

[2] San Diego Plant Index

A local plant catalog and filtering foundation exist. San Diego catalog; checked October 20, 2026. Generic Size fields do not establish widths, complete rules or reuse permission.

[3] Free Garden Planner — Permapeople

A free browser planning alternative exists. Digital competitor documentation; checked October 20, 2026. Not hands-on tested; described saving/sharing has an account qualification.

[4] Garden designs — Waterwise Garden Planner

Prepared garden combinations compete with the proposed result. Inland Southern California; checked October 20, 2026. No exhaustive feature comparison or universal coastal suitability established.

[5] Make your Garden Planting Plan

Arrangement, mature dimensions and counting constitute a concrete planting workflow. Southern California guidance, page 45; checked October 20, 2026. Task evidence, not app adoption or demonstrated customer benefit.

[6] Free San Diego Landscape Planning Tools & Cost Calculators

Existing free tools create offer overlap. San Diego business website; checked October 20, 2026. No traffic evidence or proof that all composition functionality is absent.

[7] Landscape Design San Diego

Professional design addresses broader site constraints. San Diego service description; checked October 20, 2026. No comparable fixed price or independent service-performance finding.

[8] Using WUCOLS IV Plant Database to Hydrozone Effectively

Water groups should reflect similar irrigation needs. UC guidance dated July 27, 2018; checked in supplied research. General principle, not verification of every selected species grouping.

[9] Salvia clevelandii — T-Y Nursery

One source specifies Cleveland sage width of 4–5 ft. Southern California nursery specification; checked October 20, 2026. Conflicts with P2; not a guaranteed maximum.

[10] Salvia clevelandii — Urban Tree Farm Nursery

Another source specifies a wider Cleveland sage range. Northern California nursery specification; checked October 20, 2026. Supports a conservative envelope, not universal performance.

[11] Westringia fruticosa plant guide

One Westringia source gives 3–4 ft width. California nursery guidance; checked October 20, 2026. Differs materially from P13; listing differences remain unresolved.

[12] Westringia fruticosa (White) — T-Y Nursery

A second listing gives Westringia width of 5–10 ft. Southern California nursery specification; checked October 20, 2026. White-flowered listing; do not silently substitute a compact cultivar.